Smith v. State
Smith v. State
504 S.W.3d 101; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 795; 2016 WL 4437982
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Antonio Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.