Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Parr v. Rottler Pest Control Co.

Parr v. Rottler Pest Control Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 18, 2016 · Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald
505 S.W.3d 342; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1022; 2016 WL 6080412 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Parr v. Rottler Pest Control Co.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Stephen J. Parr appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) determination that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he committed misconduct in connection with his employment at Rott-ler Pest Control ' Company (“Rottler”). Parr contends that the Commission erred because it improperly placed the burden on him to prove that he did not commit misconduct. Finding no error of law and that the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their *343information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.