Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Garrett v. Director of Revenue

Garrett v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 22, 2016 · Amburg, Dowd, Quigless, Turner
507 S.W.3d 615; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1195; 2016 WL 6872081 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Garrett v. Director of Revenue

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chalanda Garrett appeals from the circuit court’s judgment upholding the administrative revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath under Missouri’s Implied Consent Law. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the circuit court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Velluto v. Dir. of Revenue, 383 S.W.3d 14, 17 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.