Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

Curley v. Animal Clinic of Kendallwood

Curley v. Animal Clinic of Kendallwood
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 10, 2017 · Ahuja, Howard, Welsh
506 S.W.3d 414; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 14; 2017 WL 83531 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Curley v. Animal Clinic of Kendallwood

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Animal Clinic of Kendallwood, LLC and Dr. Randall Lary, its owner and operator, (collectively Defendants) appeal from the trial court’s judgment on the jury verdicts in favor of Jill Curley for both actual and punitive damages in Curley’s suit for sexual harassment under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Defendants’ points on appeal challenge the trial court’s exclusion of evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been presented to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.