Burle v. State
Burle v. State
510 S.W.3d 365; 2017 WL 491197; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 114
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Erik Burle, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Proceedings and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.” We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.