Burle v. State
Burle v. State
510 S.W.3d 365; 2017 WL 491197; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 114
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Burle v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Erik Burle, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Proceedings and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.” We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.