Bohlen v. State
Bohlen v. State
514 S.W.3d 643; 2017 WL 1149611; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 223
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Bohlen v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Brian Bohlen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.