Birdno v. State
Birdno v. State
517 S.W.3d 677; 2017 WL 1881132; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 399
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Birdno v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jason Birdno appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no clear error in the motion court’s findings and conclusions. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.