Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

Boley v. State

Boley v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 28, 2017 · Hoff, III, Lisa
518 S.W.3d 234; 2017 WL 1149612; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Boley v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.