Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

State v. Fogle

State v. Fogle
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2017 · Hoff, III, Lisa
520 S.W.3d 836; 2017 WL 2823134; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Fogle

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s Order granting the motion to • suppress physical evidence and statements obtained in a traffic stop, filed by Jax Fogle. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum *837setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑