Order

Kurt Bohonsky appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.’ He contends the motion court erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective because the court applied the incorrect standard in reviewing his claim for ineffective assistance of plea counsel. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).