Bates v. State
Bates v. State
528 S.W.3d 40
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Bates v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Rickey Bates (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.