State v. Tran
State v. Tran
528 S.W.3d 915
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Tran
Opinion of the Court
Order
John Tran appeals from his convictions for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, Tran contends the circuit court erred in not allowing defense counsel to cross-examine a witness about a prior inconsistent statement. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.