Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

Rulo v. State

Rulo v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 24, 2017 · Dowd, Odenwald, Sullivan
531 S.W.3d 104 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rulo v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marsha Rulo appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, her amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.