Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

Hemmel v. Ungashick

Hemmel v. Ungashick
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 21, 2017 · Ahuja, Hardwick, Howard
533 S.W.3d 279 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hemmel v. Ungashick

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Luke Ungashick and Automated Ingredient Systems, LLC appeal the Amended Judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court. They present four points on appeal. First, they claim the plaintiffs breach of contract claim was barred by the statute of frauds. Second, they claim the plaintiffs breach of contract claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Third, they claim the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees was beyond the scope set forth in the contract at issue. Fourth, they claim they should be indemnified. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.