Inge v. State
Inge v. State
534 S.W.3d 296
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Inge v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Daryl Inge, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.