Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

State v. Hampton

State v. Hampton
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 19, 2017
541 S.W.3d 635 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Hampton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

*636Niesha Hampton appeals from the judgment entered on her convictions after a jury trial for statutory rape and statutory sodomy. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and we find no other errors. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.