Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017

Haywood v. State

Haywood v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 14, 2017
544 S.W.3d 249 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Haywood v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Steven Haywood appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule *25029.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.