Hughes v. State
Hughes v. State
537 S.W.3d 426
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Hughes v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The movant, Martine. Hughes, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing.
. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We.affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rute 84.16(b)(2).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.