Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018

Fox v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 17, 2018

544 S.W.3d 701 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fox v. Precythe (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Joseph L. Fox appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (judgment) of the motion court denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.