C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).