Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).