Correll v. State
Correll v. State
Opinion of the Court
Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
All rules references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.