Peete v. State
Peete v. State
567 S.W.3d 670
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Peete v. State
Opinion of the Court
Patrick D. Peete (Movant) appeals the judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred because his convictions for sixteen counts of stealing and concurrent seven-year sentences were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.