Missouri Court of Appeals, 2019

Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.

Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 12, 2019
570 S.W.3d 166 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Barnett v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Harley-Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, Trumbull Insurance Company, (collectively, Harley-Davidson) appeal from a Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) Final Award Allowing Compensation to Michael Barnett. In its sole point on appeal, Harley-Davidson argues that the Commission erred in its award because Barnett presented insufficient competent evidence to support a finding that an occupational exposure was the prevailing factor in causing his medical condition and disability. Because there was sufficient competent evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commission's finding of medical causation, we affirm the Commission's award. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.