Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren)
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren), 70 B.R. 124 (1986)
1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6896
Carlson v. Warren (In re Warren)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
“[A] ‘motion for reconsideration,’ although filed within 10 days, contained no request to alter or amend judgment (though maybe that was implicit) but merely informed the court that the movant would file at a later date a memorandum of law. Essentially, then, the motion was a request for extension of time, and extensions of time are not permitted for Rule 59(e) motions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b).” A.D. Weiss Lithograph Company v. Illinois Adhesive Products, 705 F.2d 249, 250 (7th Cir. 1983). It is therefore
ORDERED that the above and foregoing “motion for reconsideration” be, and it is hereby, DENIED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Ralph WARREN, and Melba Jean Warren, Debtors. Thomas J. CARLSON v. Michael Ray WARREN, and Carol Ann Warren
- Status
- Published