District Court, E.D. Missouri, 2021

Ketsenburg v. ChexSystems, Incorporated

Ketsenburg v. ChexSystems, Incorporated
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Decided May 10, 2021
Ketsenburg v. ChexSystems, Incorporated

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

JOSEPH MATTHEW KETSENBURG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 4:21-CV-220 RLW v. ) ) CHEXSYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading (ECF No. 18). The Motion states that self-represented Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg intends to file an Amended Complaint following discussions with Defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated, and the parties have agreed to a schedule for the filing of an Amended Complaint and for Defendant’s response thereto.

Plaintiff is advised that a self-represented litigant is not excused from complying with Court orders or substantive and procedural law “even without affirmative notice of the application of the rules to his case.” Bennett v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., 295 F.3d 805, 808 (8th Cir. 2002). See also Bunch v. University of Ark. Bd. of Trustees, 863 F.3d 1062, 1067 (8th Cir. 2017) (party’s “status as a pro se litigant did not excuse her from following the local rules.”); Lindstedt v. City of Granby, 238 F.3d 933, 937 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (self-represented litigant is bound by the same litigation rules as a lawyer, particularly when fulfilling simple requirements of discovery). The Court's Local Rules and other resources for self-represented litigants are available on the Eastern District of Missouri’s website.

Eastern District of Missouri Local Rule 2.06(A) states, “All actions brought by self-represented plaintiffs or petitioners should be filed on Court-provided forms where applicable. If an action is not filed on a Court-provided form, the Court, in its discretion, may order the self-represented plaintiff or petitioner to file the action on a Court-provided form.”

Plaintiff’s original Complaint was not filed on a Court-provided form. The Court will direct the Clerk to send Plaintiff a civil complaint form. Plaintiff is not required to use this form for his amended complaint, but the Court reserves the right to order Plaintiff to replead his claims on such a form after it reviews any amended complaint.

Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint entirely, so it must include all claims Plaintiff wishes to bring. See, e.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005).

Plaintiff’s amended complaint must comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 8 requires plaintiff to set forth a short and plain statement of the claim showing entitlement to relief, and it also requires that each averment be simple, concise and direct. Rule requires plaintiff to state his claims in separately numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.

In addition, Plaintiff shall use the case caption as shown above on this Memorandum and Order on his amended complaint, and the case number as shown above including the initials “RLW” following the case number.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ joint Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that complies with the requirements of this Memorandum and Order by May 19, 2021. If Plaintiff fails to meet this deadline, the Court will treat the original Complaint as the operative complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated, shall file its response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint or, if an Amended Complaint is not filed, a response to the pending operative Complaint, by June 9, 2021.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a Civil Complaint form along with this Memorandum and Order.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties shall use the correct case number, 4:21-CV-220 RLW, on all future filings.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 10th day of May, 2021.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.