Thurman v. Rug Doctor

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Thurman v. Rug Doctor

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BENJAMIN THURMAN, ) Plaintiff, Vv. No. 4:23-CV-659 SPM RUG DOCTOR, Defendant, OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 22]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 15 & 16;

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 445

(1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 22] is DENIED. Dated this 15" day of December, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown