UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

SUCHA SAUDA, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:25 CV 1025 CDP ) SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY ) OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This newly filed case is before me for review of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff Sucha Sauda, LLC, brings this breach of contract action in diversity alleging that defendant Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina breached its insurance contract with plaintiff by failing to properly evaluate and investigate plaintiff’s claim of damage to its insured property and by failing to pay for covered damage to the property. Plaintiff also brings a claim of vexatious refusal to pay. Plaintiff invokes this Court’s diversity jurisdiction under

. I have reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and find that there is no adequate statement of citizenship with respect to either party to the case. I will therefore order plaintiff to file an amended complaint to properly allege this Court’s subject- matter jurisdiction. In its complaint, plaintiff identifies itself as “a Limited Liability Company registered in the State of Missouri and principally located at 9241 W Florissant Ave, Ferguson, MO 63136.” (ECF 1 at ¶ 1.) For purposes of diversity, however,

a limited liability company’s citizenship is the citizenship of all its members. GMAC Commercial Credit LLC v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc.,

(8th Cir. 2004). Plaintiff does not identity its members, nor does it allege the

members’ citizenship. As to defendant Selective Insurance Company, plaintiff avers that it is “a foreign corporation registered and licensed to sell insurance in the State of Missouri. Defendant’s principal address is 900 E. 96th Street, Suite 400,

Indianapolis, IN 46240[.]” (ECF 1 at ¶ 2.) With respect to corporate defendants, however, a proper statement of citizenship includes the corporation’s place of incorporation

and its principal place of business. Sanders v. Clemco Indus.,

(8th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff’s description of the defendant here is insufficient to establish its citizenship. Because there is no sufficient statement of citizenship with respect to either

party in the case, I am unable to determine if this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, I will give plaintiff seven (7) days to amend its complaint to properly allege this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Failure to

timely comply with this Order may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Sucha Sauda, LLC, shall file an amended complaint within seven (7) days of the date of this Order to properly allege this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

CATHERINE D.PERRY // UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 15th day of July, 2025.

_3-