Exparte Cox
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jenkins v. Andrews (Mo. Ct. App. 1975)
- Martin v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
- City of Kansas City v. Wiley (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
- State ex rel. Oliver v. Bradley (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
- Savings Finance Corporation v. Blair (Mo. Ct. App. 1955)
- State ex rel. Carleton v. District Court (Mont. 1905)
- Ex parte Chambers (Mo. Ct. App. 1881)
- Woodrow v. Younger (Mo. 1875)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
It appears from the petition of Adeline Cox, and the record accompanying it, that a suit was instituted by Jacob Cox against the petitioner, who was his wife, for a divorce — that bill and answer were filed — issues made up and tried by a jury — and a verdict found. At this stage of the proceedings, Jacob Cox applied for a change of venue, on the ground that the Judge of the Platte Circuit Court was prejudiced against him. The change was ordered, and this application is to compel the said Circuit Court to proceed and determine the cause.
Our statute which authorizes a change of venue in civil cases, does not in terms declare at what period of the cause such orders may be made. There can b'e no doubt, however, that it never was contemplated that the progress of a suit could be interrupted at any period by such applications. The law must be construed with reference to the practice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.