Altum v. Arnold
Altum v. Arnold
27 Mo. 264
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Meridian Lumber Co. v. Lowry Lumber Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1921)
- Wischmeyer v. Richardson (Mo. 1900)
- Zimmerman v. Chicago, Great Western Railway Co. (Mo. 1900)
- Rice, Stix & Co. v. McClure & Harper (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Riffe v. Wabash Railroad (Mo. Ct. App. 1897)
- Bethune v. Cleveland, St. Louis & Kansas City Railway Co. (Mo. 1897)
- DeGiverville v. Legg (Mo. Ct. App. 1892)
- Mead v. Spalding (Mo. 1887)
- Tyler v. Larimore (Mo. Ct. App. 1885)
- Ford v. City of Cameron (Mo. Ct. App. 1885)
- Cunningham v. Snow (Mo. 1884)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This suit was commenced since the revised statutes of 1855 took effect, and was tried by the court without instructions, and without raising any questions of law during the progress of the trial. Therefore, according to the settled practice of this court, which has been established by a series of decisions and recognized in several cases at the present term, the judgment must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.