Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Scott v. Young (Mo. Ct. App. 1905)
- Lovings v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. (W. Va. 1900)
- State v. Van Matre (Mo. 1872)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an appeal from the justice’s court. In the Circuit Court the case was tried by a jury of six against the objections of the appellant, who required the jury to consist of twelve men. For this cause the judgment of the Circuit Court must, in accordance with the previous decisions of this court upon the questions here raised, be reversed. (Foster v. Kirby, 31 Mo. 496; Vaughan v. Scade, 30 id. 600.) It is not believed that a decision of the other question presented by the appellant would materially assist the Circuit Court in a re-trial of the case, and we will therefore pass them without further notice.
the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.