State ex rel. Dyer v. Thompson
State ex rel. Dyer v. Thompson
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The relator alleges in his petition that on the-day of January, 1867, he was elected secretary of the Missouri State Senate ; that after such election he took the oath of office and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office, and so continued until the 14th day of March, 1867, at which time the regular session of the 24th General Assembly adjourned ; that by the laws of the State it was made his duty as such secretary to keep a journal of the proceedings at the Senate, and to cause a copy thereof to be furnished to tUe
The only question raised for the determination of the court, is, whether the appendix which the law authorizes and requires to be printed and bound with the journal, constitutes a part of the journal proper, so as to entitle the secretary to receive the same pay for making it out as the law allows for copying the daily proceedings of the Senate.
Section 17, ch. 7, of the General Laws makes it the duty of the Senate and House of Representatives to cause the journals of their respective houses to be copied and prepared for press, without delay. Section 20 of the same chapter prescribes the amount which shall be allowed by the secretary and the clerk of the respective houses for copying the journals for the press, and requires the State Auditor to audit and adjust the accounts when presented for such services.
Section 21 of ch. 20 provides that the journals of each house shall be bound in a certain manner, and explicitly declares that the reports and public documents shall be contained within the journals under the head of appendix ; and by section 28 the duty is devolved on the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House of Representatives to furnish to the public printer, every day during the session of the General Assembly, a copy of the journal of their respective houses for the day preceding, till the whole journal shall be copied and delivered.
It stands admitted on the record that the work was done by the petitioner, and a peremptory mandamus must therefore be ordez’ed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Missouri ex rel. David P. Dyer, Secretary of the State Senate v. Alonzo Thompson, State Auditor
- Status
- Published