Richardson v. North Missouri Insurance
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Clark v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen (Mo. Ct. App. 1903)
- Sisk v. American Central Fire Insurance (Mo. Ct. App. 1902)
- Hester v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1897)
- Okey v. State Insurance (Mo. Ct. App. 1888)
- Ætna Insurance v. Kittles (Ind. 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action on a policy of fire insurance. The defendant filed an answer to the merits, and after the cause had been continued several terms, the defendant withdrew its answer, and the plaintiff took judgment for want -of answer —which was made final.
The defendant filed a motion in arrest, alleging that the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. .
This motion was overruled and the defendant excepted, and has appealed to this court.
The only point made is, that the petition does not specifically allege notice and proofs of loss, which were conditions precedent to the plaintiff’s right of recovery.
The petition does allege that tin) plaintiff' “duly fulfilled all the conditions of said policy on his part.” This is ail our practice act requires. (See 2nd "Wagn. Stat., 1020, § 42.)
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.