Adams v. Lindell
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hamrick v. George (Okla. 1963)
- Seanor v. Board of County Commissioners (Wash. 1895)
- Rath v. LaFon (Okla. 1967)
- School District of Kirkwood R-7 v. Zeibig (Mo. 1958)
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 28 of New Madrid County v. Thompson (Mo. 1931)
- Redman v. St. Joseph Hay & Grain Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
- Commerce Trust Co. v. Lot Co. and Johnson (Mo. Ct. App. 1921)
- The Parker-Washington Co. v. Field (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
- Ranney v. City of Cape Girardeau (Mo. 1914)
- City of Boonville ex rel. Cosgrove v. Stephens (Mo. 1911)
- White v. Bailey (W. Va. 1909)
- Hilgert v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1904)
- New York Life Ins. v. Prest (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri 1896)
- Simpson v. McGonegal (Mo. Ct. App. 1893)
- City of St. Louis v. Stoddard (Mo. Ct. App. 1884)
- Eyerman v. Blaksley (Mo. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case involves three points, all of which are elaborately discussed and decided by the court of appeals, and the opinion of that court reported in 5th vol. of Mo. App. Rep. 197. One of the points was also examined and decided in the case of the State to the use of Beach v. Sutton, reported in vol. 3 of Mo. App. Rep. 388. As we concur with that court, not only in the result, but in the decision on each point involved in the case, it seems unnecessary to do more than to refer to these cases. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.