Horton v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.
Horton v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
This suit was instituted by plaintiff in the circuit court of Clinton county, to recover damages for the wrongful conversion by defendants of certain
It is insisted by defendants that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury, that on the evidence and pleading, plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The evidence showed that in September, October, and November, 1870, E. C. Horton, plaintiff’s intestate, plastered five depots on the line of the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad, and furnished materials with which the work was done ; that within the time prescribed by law, he filed his lien and account against the North Missouri Railroad Company, with which company it is alleged he made, the contract for doing the work; that he instituted proceedings in the circuit courts of Clinton and Buchanan counties, respectively, to enforce his lien against said buildings and the right of way on which they were situated; that judgments were obtained in 1871, to be levied on the respective depot buildings, and the right of way on which the same stands on the St. Louis and St. Joseph railroad. Executions issued on these judgments, and the depot buildings, and the right of way on which they stood, were sold by the sheriff on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1872, and the said Horton be-came the purchaser, and received a deed therefor. Horton died in April, 1873, and on the seventh of February, 1877, plaintiff was appointed administratrix of his estate and thereafter instituted this suit against the present defendants, alleging that the depots in question wera
The deposition of White, offered in evidence and admitted over the objections of defendants, simply showed that in December, 1870, the St. Louis and St. Joseph railroad went into bankruptcy and that Mr. Knappner was the assignee, and in March, 1871, he handled several proofs of claims against the bankrupt •company, among which was at least one presented by the North Missouri Railroad Company, which he remembered was for open accounts, for money paid on pay rolls, due by the bankrupt company, and for money alleged to have been spent by the North Missouri Railroad Company, in the latter part of 1870. His impression was the account commenced about the first of September, 1870, that he knew nothing of his own knowledge of the running of the St. Louis and St. Joseph railroad by the North Missouri Railroad Company. Plaintiff also read in evidence what purported to be a copy of an agreement entered into between L. H. Lawson, president of the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company, and Barton Bates, president of the North Missouri Railroad Company, dated June 15, 1870. This was a mere memorandum of an agreement to the effect that the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company, would, when its road was completed, lease the same to the North Missouri Railroad Company, and the plain inference to be drawn from it, is, that the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company was to furnish and complete its road.
Defendant offered evidence showing that the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company was duly incorporated on the thirty-first day of December, 1867, and that on the second day of November, 1868, the said company executed a deed of trust, which was duly recorded in Clinton and Buchanan counties, to the Farmers Loan and Trust Company, of New York, on its entire line of railroad, track, rights of way, depot buildings, station
The evidence of Golden and Patock, and that of witness, How, who was secretary of the North Missouri Railroad Company in the years 1869 and 1870, and until it went into bankruptcy, and also that of James H. Bisch, who, for a short time was president of the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company, and director from the organization of the company until it went into bankruptcy, is to the effect that the St. Louis and St. Joseph Railroad Company built the depot buildings, and that the road was neither owned by the North Missouri Railroad Company, nor did it build the depots or any other part of the road. Defendant, also, read in evidence the proceedings of a suit in ejectment by Elmer Horton, guardian of John E. Horton, to recover said depot buildings against the St. Louis, Kansas City and Northern Railroad Company, and the finding and judgment of the court for defendant.
It is provided by section 3172, Revised Statutes, which was the law in force at the time the depots in question were built, that before a mechanic or person who shall do or perform any labor upon any building upon land can assert a lien, he must show that it was done under a contract, either with the owner or proprietor thereof, or his agent, trustee, contractor,- or subcontractor. There is no evidence in this case that at the time the depots were erected, the North Missouri Railroad Company, which was the only party made to the lien proceeding instituted by Horton, was either the owner
Judgment reversed,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Horton, Administratrix v. The St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Company
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published