State v. Scott
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- State Ex Rel. Stewart v. Civil Service Commission (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. Vanderburg (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
- Mathieson v. Hubler (N.M. Ct. App. 1978)
- Rodda v. Rodda (Or. 1948)
- Senner v. Danewolf (Or. 1932)
- Coffee v. Harris (Wyo. 1921)
- School District No. 1 v. Boyle (Mo. Ct. App. 1905)
- Ex parte Bradshaw (Ala. 1911)
- State v. Paul (Mo. 1907)
- Doherty v. Robb (Mo. 1900)
- Union National Bank v. Barker (Mo. 1898)
- State v. Apperson (Mo. 1893)
- Dorman v. Coon (Mo. 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant, a negro, appeals from a conviction of an assault with intent to ravish a white woman, his punishment being assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of five years.
Under the provisions of section 2168, Revised Statutes, 1889, a bill of “exceptions may be written and filed at the time or during the term of the court at which it is taken, or within such time thereafter as the court may by an order entered of record allow, which may be extended by the court or judge in vacation for good cause shown.” This section is found in the chapter relating to “civil procedure,” but it is provided in the chapter relating to “practice and proceedings” in criminal cases that the same steps are to be taken in regard to bills of exceptions in criminal cases as in civil cases. Revised Statutes, 1889, sec. 4221; State v. McDonald, 85 Mo. 539, and cases cited; State v. Griffin, 98 Mo. 672; State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. 107.
This view of the matter results in holding that there is no bill of exceptions preserved, and, since there is no error in the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.