Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894

Wade v. Ringo

Wade v. Ringo
Supreme Court of Missouri · Decided May 28, 1894 · MacEarlane
122 Mo. 322; 25 S.W. 901; 1894 Mo. LEXIS 67

Counsel

S. W. Bickley and J. M. Banker for appellant., George Robertson and W. W. Fry for respondent.

Wade v. Ringo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)

Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.

Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.