State v. Wray
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Miller v. Kansas City Light & Power Co. (8th Cir. 1926)
- Hiestand v. Geier (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
- School District of Kirkwood R-7 v. Zeibig (Mo. 1958)
- Fort Osage Drainage District of Jackson County v. Jackson County (Mo. 1955)
- State ex inf. Wright v. Morgan (Mo. 1916)
- Blanchard v. Dorman (Mo. 1911)
- Coy v. Landers (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
- Kries v. Holladay-Klotz Land & Lumber Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1906)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Indicted for grand larceny, the defendant was convicted of that ofíense and appeals to this court.
The indictment is sufficient. The evidence has been preserved in the bill of exceptions, but inasmuch as the motion for a new trial has not been preserved in the bill, nor preserved in the record and called for in the bill, the clerk being directed to copy the same, we can not look into any exceptions taken nor into the evidence adduced. R. S. 1889, sec. 2304; State v. Griffin, 98 Mo. 672.
As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.