State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Gill
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Buffum v. Stokes (Fla. 1931)
- Mudd v. Wehmeyer (Mo. 1929)
- State ex rel. Warde v. McQuillin (Mo. 1914)
- Coffman v. Saline Valley Railroad (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM.
The application of the attorney-general for a preliminary rule in prohibition against Judge Gill, to prevent his taking further proceedings on a writ of habeas corpus issued by him on the application of Mr. Lowe, is denied.
Without going into the merits of the question whether or not Mr. Lowe is in contempt, it is the opinion of the judges present that, as the application here does not show that the alleged want of jurisdiction (on which the application for prohibition is founded) appears in the record or proceedings before Judge Gill, the objection of want of jurisdiction on his part should, at least, be first presented to Judge Gill upon a showing of said facts.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.