State v. Baughman

Supreme Court of Missouri
State v. Baughman, 184 Mo. 192 (Mo. 1904)
83 S.W. 1133; 1904 Mo. LEXIS 260
Burgess, Gantt

State v. Baughman

Opinion of the Court

GANTT, P. J.

The record in this cause is before us on writ of error.

The indictment alone is challenged, and as it is in •all respect's identical with the indictment in State v. Rosenblatt, 185 Mo. 114, for the' reasons assigned in that case it is held sufficient, and the writ of error quashed.

All concur, except Burgess, J., absent.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. BAUGHMAN WILLIAM TRACEY, in Error
Status
Published