This is a proceeding by writ of habeas corpus in which all the material facts are identical with those in the ease in which A. N. Welborn is the petitioner (Ex parte Welborn, ante, p. 297). The cases were argued- as one, and, for the reasons given in that case, the conclusion in this is that the petitioner must be remanded.

The foregoing opinion of Blair, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.