This is a companion case to tbe case involving tbe refunding of State of Missouri Building Bonds and the case involving tbe State Road Bonds, Series V. Since tbe parties are in tbe same in each of tbe cases, the cases may be identified and distinguished by our file number. The Building Bond case carries the number 34,789, 339 Mo. 204, 96 S. W. (2d) 348. The case involving tbe refunding of tbe State Road Bonds, Series V (the seventy-five million dollar road bond issue) is number 34,800, 339 Mo. 214, 96 S. W. (2d) 352. The present case is No. 34,795 and'involves tbe .power of the-State Board of Fund Commissioners to refund state bonds constituting a portion of the sixty million, dollar road bond issue authorized by Section 44a, Article IY of the Constitution. Tbe controlling issues are identical with tbe issues decided in case number' 34,789. One' distinction should be noted however. Tbe Building Bond case — number 34,789 — was determined upon tbe construction we placed upon Section 11500, Revised Statutes 1929. A statute not referred to in that case is material here. It is' Section 10 of tbe Act approved August 27, 1921, appearing in Laws of Missouri, 1921, First Extra Session, page 130. That act was passed as an .incident to tbe Constitutional Amendment of 1920 authorizing tbe issuance and sale of State Road Bonds to the extent of sixty million dollars. Section 10 is as follows:

*214 “All bonds herein authorized to be issued shall be paid at maturity and all interest accruing thereon shall be paid when it falls due by the state treasurer, at a place nominated in the bonds and coupons attached. Thirty days before any of the bonds mature and any interest thereon falls due, the state auditor shall draw his warrant on the state treasurer in a sum sufficient to pay maturing bonds and interest falling due. Whenever in the opinion of the board of fund commissioners it is advisable to do so, and there are sufficient funds therefor, the said board may redeem any of said bonds before maturity if the holders thereof agree thereto, and may also purchase any of said bonds in the open market whenever funds are available, and in the opinion of said board, it is to the advantage of the state to do so.” (Italics ours.)

The language of this section adds support to the construction we placed upon Section 11500, supra, in case number 34,789 and further convinces us that the Legislature in the enactment and amendment of Section 11500 in 1913 (Laws 1913, p. 772) did not intend to depart from the principle expressed by it in the introductory words of its Act of March 31, 1885:

“Whereas, The maintenance of the credit of the state is of the utmost importance and should ever be guarded with the most jealous care.” [Laws 1885, p. 39.]

For the reasons stated in State ex rel. Board of Fund Commissioners et al. v. Smith (Mo. 34,789), 339 Mo. 204, 96 S. W. (2d) 348, our alternative writ heretofore issued is quashed.