Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION
NICHOLAS MARTIN PLAINTIFF
NO. 3:19CV00075-JMV
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT
ORDER ON PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion [19] for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Defendant’s response [20]. For the reasons set out below, the motion is granted. In these proceedings Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying claims for benefits. By Final Judgment [18] dated July 10, 2020, this Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Plaintiff now seeks $5,800.00 in fees for attorney work before this Court on the grounds that Plaintiff was the prevailing party and the Commissioner’s position was not “substantially justified.” The Commissioner does not oppose the requested award. The Court, having thoroughly considered the motion, response, and the applicable law, finds the requested award is reasonable; and no special circumstance would make the award unjust. Consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff,
130 S. Ct. 2521(2010), however, the check should be made payable to Plaintiff. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: That the Commissioner shall promptly pay to Plaintiff $5,800.00 in attorney fees for the benefit of his counsel. This 19th day of October, 2020.
/s/ Jane M. Virden U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown