Baker v. Gann

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Baker v. Gann

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD BAKER PLAINTIFF

VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18cv410-FKB

TERRY GANN, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER Richard Baker filed this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

while he was a detainee at the Yazoo County Regional Correctional Facility (YCRCF). Presently before the Court is the motion [41] of Defendants Mary Cotton, Dustin Wadford, and Christopher Dean pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process or, in the alternative, to quash service. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. The Court concludes that service should be quashed and that process should be re-issued for these defendants. The docket sheet reflects that the United States Marshal attempted service on these defendants on December 13, 2019. See [38], [39], and [40]. The proof of service indicates that the summons forms were left with Patty Fletcher at YCRCF. However, in their motion, movants state that Ms. Fletcher, an accounts payable and inventory clerk at the facility, was not authorized to accept service for them. Attached to their motion is the affidavit of Ms. Fletcher, confirming her lack of authority. Where service is insufficient but curable, a court should generally quash the service, rather than dismiss, and give the defendant another opportunity for service. Bradley v. City of Hattiesburg Police Dep't, No. 2:12CV206-HSO-RHW,

2014 WL 1050411

, at *3 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 17, 2014) (citing Albo v. Suzuki Motor Corp., Civ. No. 308–0139–KC,

2008 WL 2783508

, *1 (W.D.Tex. July 2, 2008). This approach is particularly appropriate in the present case, as Plaintiff, who is proceeding in forma pauperis, had no control over the manner of service. According, it is hereby ordered that service on Defendants Cotton, Wadford, and Dean is quashed. The Clerk is directed to re-issue a summons for each of these

defendants and to forward same to the United States Marshal for service. So ordered, this the 21st day of September, 2020.

s/ F. Keith Ball _____________ United States Magistrate Judge

2

Reference

Status
Unknown