White v. Saul
White v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION
WESLEY WHITE PLAINTIFF
V. NO. 3:20CV00121-JMV
ANDREW SAUL Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT
ORDER BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiff’s motion [21] for an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act,
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Defendant’s response [22]. Having considered the motion and the applicable law—and noting Defendant concedes the requested fee is reasonable—the Court finds the EAJA award requested is reasonable. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for $5,138.78 in attorney fees is GRANTED. The award shall be promptly paid to Plaintiff, however, for the benefit of his counsel. See Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586(2010). SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2021.
/s/ Jane M. Virden United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown