Pearson v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Pearson v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

TIMOTHY DANIEL PEARSON PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:20-CV-79-DMB-RP

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT

ORDER On March 11, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. #24. The R&R recommends that the decision be reversed and remanded for a rehearing as unsupported by substantial evidence. Id. at 6. No objections to the R&R were filed within the time allowed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.,

644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828

(E.D. Tex. 2009) (internal citations omitted) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415

, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [24] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. SO ORDERED, this 6th day of April, 2021. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown