Floyd v. Saul

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION ROGER DALE FLOYD PLAINTIFF V. NO. 1:20-CV-107-DMB-DAS ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT

ORDER On May 27, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. #23. The R&R recommends that the decision be reversed and remanded as unsupported by substantial evidence. Id. at 9. No objections to the R&R were filed.

“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.”

Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [23] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further consideration.

SO ORDERED, this 14th day of June, 2021. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE