District Court, N.D. Mississippi, 2021

Goliday v. Saul

Goliday v. Saul
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Decided June 15, 2021
Goliday v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

OXFORD DIVISION

SHAHIRA JANAE GOLIDAY PLAINTIFF V. NO. 3:20-CV-228-DMB-RP ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT

ORDER

On May 21, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal by Shahira Janae Goliday from an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. #23. The R&R recommends that the decision be reversed and remanded for a rehearing of Goliday’s application under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Id. at 6. No objections to the R&R were filed.

“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [23] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED.

SO ORDERED, this 15th day of June, 2021. /s/Debra M. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.