Giles v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Giles v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

JOE WILLIS GILES PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-93-SA-RP

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT

ORDER

On May 20, 2021, United States Magistrate Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation [27] in this cause. The R&R concludes that “the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed.” [27], p. 1. The R&R set forth a time period of fourteen days for the parties to object to the R&R, if they chose to do so. No objections have been filed, and the deadline has now passed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.,

644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828

(E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415

, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED IN FULL as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is hereby AFFIRMED. This CASE is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 12th day of July, 2021.

/s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown