Harris v. Hansell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

GREENVILLE DIVISION

LAKIESHA SHUNTA HARRIS PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-CV-034-SA-JMV MARILYN HANSELL and

ANN SHANNON DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On July 30, 2021, Magistrate Judge Virden entered a Report and Recommendation [7] in this cause. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Virden recommended “that this case be dismissed with prejudice unless Plaintiff alleges facts in objections to this report and recommendation that support a legally cognizable federal claim.” [7] at p. 5. The Magistrate Judge gave the Plaintiff fourteen (14) days from the date of the Report and Recommendation [7] to file any objections. The Plaintiff has not filed any objections, and the time to do so has passed. When a party does not file an objection, “the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [7] and finds it to be well- reasoned and that that there is no plain error.

The Court therefore ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation [7]. The Plaintiff’s claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED, this the 16th day of August, 2021.

/s/ Sharion Aycock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE